<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>strangnet.tech &#187; vulnerabilities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.strangnet.se/tag/vulnerabilities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.strangnet.se</link>
	<description>Development, Technology, Internet, Open Source and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:17:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Secunia reports high numbers of &#8220;unpatched&#8221; computers</title>
		<link>http://tech.strangnet.se/2008/12/secunia-reports-high-numbers-of-unpatched-computers/</link>
		<comments>http://tech.strangnet.se/2008/12/secunia-reports-high-numbers-of-unpatched-computers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secunia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vulnerabilities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.strangnet.se/?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Secunia&#8217;s software version checking tool PSI has given them data on how many of the scanned systems that are fully patched, and the number seems rather poor at first glance. 1.91% of all the PCs that has used the tool, since its version 1.0 was released, were fully patched. 45.76% had 11 or more unpatched [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Secunia&#8217;s software version checking tool PSI has given them data on how many of the scanned systems that are fully patched, and the number seems rather poor at first glance. <a title="1.91% of all PCs are fully patched! - Secunia Blog" href="http://secunia.com/blog/37/">1.91% of all the PCs</a> that has used the tool, since its <a href="http://secunia.com/vulnerability_scanning/personal/">version 1.0</a> was released, were fully patched. 45.76% had 11 or more unpatched applications.</p>
<p>Secunia emphasizes that this is to be considered as a best case scenario, as users of their tool are to be considered security aware.</p>
<p>From my own experience of running the tool, it is that these numbers should be taken with a grain of salt. Even though all software are up-to-date on a system, the tool still finds old files remaining but not in use &#8211; Flash tends to be a good example where a plethora of versions can be spread out on your system without being in use. It also won&#8217;t take into account whether the unpatched applications are even used anymore &#8211; they might have been installed once and just forgotten.</p>
<p>Sometimes updated software could mean that other software or features become incompatible, and would be another reason for not updating.</p>
<p>Even still, it&#8217;s always best to keep most software updated. It usually isn&#8217;t much hassle at all any longer, just a few clicks with your mouse (or a few more if on Vista with UAC). The way that software repositories in popular Linux distributions work, is really to the advantage when it comes to everyday software update checking.</p>
<p>(via: <a title="IDG.se - 98 procent av alla hemdatorer opatchade" href="http://www.idg.se/2.1085/1.197697/98-procent-av-alla-hemdatorer-opatchade">IDG</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tech.strangnet.se/2008/12/secunia-reports-high-numbers-of-unpatched-computers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
